And this, my friends, is why I’m such a grammar nazi. Although, I do admit to my own grammatical faults and errors (of which there are many). ((Is that correct? I don’t know. Oh gosh.))
From the first time we step into an English class, we’re told that the rules matter, that they must be followed, that we must know when it’s appropriate to use a comma and what it means to employ the subjunctive mood. But do these things really matter? Outside of the classroom, what difference does it make if we write “who” instead of “whom” or say “good” instead of “well”?
Ryan Bloom breaks down the language wars in his post, “Inescapably, You’re Judged by Your Language”: http://nyr.kr/M2IOWy
A hugely fascinating read (click the title!) from the ever venerable Atlantic Magazine (my love and admiration for this publication knows no bounds) about the geopolitical landscape of Vietnam, its combative history with China (who still refuses to let up and leave it alone) and a myriad of other things from its corrupt government, the pull between capitalism and communism and how Hanoi is less afraid of Arab Spring influences than the student uprising at Tiananmen Square in ‘89 (the conditions of which seem to be mirroring the growing discontent of the youth population today). Oh, and I suppose it’s also about America, although the weakening superpower hardly has a prominent place in the Vietnamese consciousness as Americans would like to believe.
Here’s a chunk of the (very long) article that’s rather telling:
Because the Soviet Union failed to help Vietnam in 1979, the Vietnamese will never again fully trust a faraway power. Beyond geography, the Vietnamese at a certain fundamental level distrust the United States. One official tells me simply that the U.S. is in decline, a condition worsened by Washington’s continued fixation—despite recent protestations to the contrary—on the Middle East rather than on the rise of China in East Asia. Though such an analysis is self-serving, it may nevertheless be accurate. Then there is the fear that the U.S. will sell out Vietnam for the sake of a warmer relationship with China: Xuan, the foreign-affairs-committee official, specifically mentions Nixon’s opening to China as providing the geostrategic context for China’s invasion of Vietnam. “It can happen again,” he tells me, shaking his head in frustration. One official of the Communist government tells me, “The elephant in the room during our discussions with the Americans is democracy and human rights.” The Vietnamese live in fear that pressure from Congress, the media, and various nongovernmental organizations may one day cause the White House to sell them out the way it has sold out autocratic Asian countries: Uzbekistan and Nepal, for example. “The highest value should be on national solidarity and independence,” Le Chi Dzung, a Foreign Ministry deputy director-general, tells me, trying to explain his country’s political philosophy. “It is the nation, not the individual, that makes you free.”
This is a post about the person I’ve become since taking off to Vietnam exactly a year ago today, May 24, 2012. Vietnam was a grueling adventure filled with more anxiety, angst, stress and tears than I expected. It was the journey of self-discovery that we all secretly want, tempered with larger-than-self responsibilities that come part-and-parcel with charity and NGO work. The four months I spent living like a nomad in the country of my heritage were equal parts thrilling, exhausting and isolating.
This is not the original post. My original one was filled with woe-is-me rhetoric. “I can’t have joy and not question it,” “There’s an interminable guilt swallowing me whole,” and more of such nonsense. It was poignant and honest, but self-indulgent and verbose. Also, defensively self-pitying. I queued it to publish for this morning, and then realized after reading it again what an annoying twit I am.
The truth is that travel changes you. Specifically voluntourism, the new vogue for privileged Western/North American folks. Everybody and their mom has been to a country in the global South, taken pictures with village children and come back with ethnic clothing and a tan. The majority are happy and invigorated. They post pictures up on Facebook and talk about what an amazing experience their trip to the Third World was and their friends and family are so proud of them. And the people that haven’t gone want to go (and those who don’t are heartless human beings).
People have come back from these trips with renewed energy and newfound appreciation for life, thankful for their experience in the global South but otherwise still removed from it, locking their memories up in a tiny corner at the back of their mind. And others have loved their trips so much that they dream of the opportunity to return to those villages to play with the children. They can’t wait to go back.
I wasn’t a voluntourist, but an actual volunteer—working for four straight months. And though my experience was significantly different, I take issue with the fact that I didn’t reap the same rewards as the voluntourist majority.
Let me briefly illustrate.
From the moment I stepped foot back in Canada—my home—I have felt more and more like I don’t belong here, boiling down to my diminished tolerance of the perceived problems of my middle- to upper-class peers. I avoided company and threw myself in my studies (and am pleased to report that this has been the most rigorous and rewarding year in my academic career thus far). Connecting with people became a Herculean challenge, resulting in the breakdown of many friendships. I have cried more this year than I have in the past five and can’t be away from my family too long without experiencing tremendous sadness and deprivation. My health, as a result, has suffered.
On one level, I’ve gained clarity, as if a layer has been peeled off the world’s surface, exposing the truth and importance of everyone I meet and everything I do. It’s a difficult concept to understand if you haven’t gone through what I have last summer in a similar context. And so on that same vein, no one I know quite understands me anymore. I’ve matured and evolved in so many inexplicable ways and yet nothing else has, nothing else can.
And yet, on another level, I’m baffled as to what I’m supposed to do with this new fountain of knowledge. How do I adjust to home when everything is so unchanged? My everyday circumstances haven’t caught up to me yet, and so I’m forced to wear the pretense of normalcy and stability while I itch for the tangible life-changes and transformations I so desperately need to complete—or at the very least, continue—what Vietnam started. The gods dangle those jewels in front of me but keep them just out of my reach.
The solutions are simple, right? Either suck it up and be grateful for your experience, or else leave. If life ain’t good in Canada anymore, then pack your bags and go back to Vietnam.
Ah, but I can’t. I don’t belong there either.
If I look back to my state of mind this time last year, I was pumped. This was the trip I had been waiting for. I was travelling for the first time without my family (at least, for the first month. They would join me later.) all the way to the other end of the earth. I was so ready to meet the beneficiaries of all the charity work I’d been doing the previous four years, as well as for a change of scenery and a transformation of character that I didn’t even lament being away from all the people I love or even the break-up of the best relationship I had been in thus far.
Well, I gave up four months of my life to a country I barely knew (having claim to only my ancestry and the colour of my skin) and it nearly broke me. If I knew this before my trip, would I still have willingly gone? (“Willingly” only because my mother would have forced me anyway.) I don’t know. I flipped my entire world upside-down and have nothing to show it but stamps on my passport, an increase in mental breakdowns and a complete changing of life-goals and academic pursuits that have yet to take shape.
I think the real question is, if I went back in time, would I have preferred not to have gone and lived only vaguely aware of the sufferings of humanity or go and experience another world but then live with the painful knowledge of my privileged upbringing and concomitantly, feel guilty for it for the rest of my life? Because I could have been any of the kids I visited, if circumstances were just a little bit different. I don’t know what the choice would be. I only know that the latter option, the one I’m living with right now, isn’t easy. I’ll come back next year to let you know if it’s been worth it.
If I’m going to take into consideration Romeo + Juliet, as well as Moulin Rouge, then I know that Baz Luhrmann will not disappoint with the upcoming Great Gatsby rendition with Leonardo DiCaprio and Carey Mulligan. Certainly unorthodox (I mean, Jay-Z and Kanye West?) but it looks quite thrilling. I’m really looking forward to this.
As the Quebec government lays down the new emergency law, student protesters vow to keep demonstrating through summer.
This picture was taken almost a month ago on a short family trip to Montreal, where we found ourselves lost in the pack of protesters more than once. Here, a red square lies on the pavement as student protesters march down Rue Saint Catherine on April 26, 2012.
Here’s a link to Noam Chomsky’s (of the Herman-Chomsky Propaganda Model fame that I’m sure you all remember from any introductory university politics/media/sociology/pop-culture class) essay on the declining state of the US economy, filled with Occupy-rhetoric, published online at Al Jazeera English.
There are two particular groups that he says US society is dividing into—the “plutonomy”: the rich, the ones with disposable incomes, luxury goods-buying folks, the top tenth of the one percent; and the “precariat”: people living a precarious existence at the periphery of society who have no other purpose than comprising the majority of a grand and powerful state and will protect and bail out the plutonomy when they make boo-boos. But we already knew that.
Chomsky touches on a number of interesting topics: changing the ownership of industries from corporations to the public, the lack of high-speed transportation, acceleration of the threat of climate change and the growing worker insecurity that allows big corporate money and power to get their way in the States.
“Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, at the time when he was still “Saint Alan” - hailed by the economics profession as one of the greatest economists of all time (this was before the crash for which he was substantially responsible) - was testifying to Congress in the Clinton years, and he explained the wonders of the great economy that he was supervising. He said a lot of its success was based substantially on what he called “growing worker insecurity”. If working people are insecure, if they’re part of the precariat, living precarious existences, they’re not going to make demands, they’re not going to try to get better wages, they won’t get improved benefits. We can kick ‘em out, if we don’t need ‘em. And that’s what’s called a “healthy” economy, technically speaking. And he was highly praised for this, greatly admired.”
It’s just a smidge apocalyptic when Chomsky warns that our great neighbour to the South is regressing to the Dark Ages and that if nothing starts getting done now, nothing will ever get done and these problems we see will become irreversible. Whether or not you take that seriously, these are still issues that need to be addresssed and discussed. At least, for the US (and concomitantly, Canada) who seem to be experiencing a general falling-behind on the world stage. For everyone else, you can be pleased that the hegemonic, hyperpowerful United States of A just can’t seem to be getting it together. It’s a new era. Brace yourselves, lads.
My 12-year-old, basic-history-learning self is currently laughing darkly at this ironic twist of Greece failing to form a government.
But the people don’t want austerity, damn it, so stop shoving it down their throats. I personally don’t blame them—after all, just look at the other indebted nations who underwent austere reforms and structuralization (Argentina rings a bell) and see what happened to them (more debt and more debt and then a default and then ostracization from international markets).
The politicians are also not currently very inspiring, either. Bummer, Greece.
“The transcripts of Mr Papoulias’s last three meetings, made public at the request of Alexis Tsipras, the leader of Syriza, a hard-left coalition, and Greece’s rising political star, reveal a disturbing lack of vision among the men who are supposed to be Greece’s leading politicians. Rather than tackle serious issues, such as how to keep Greece in the euro, they swapped insults and shrugged off a warning that a bank run was imminent. ‘They’re all irresponsible, none of them is capable of ending this crisis,’ says Aristomenes Antonopoulos, a lawyer. ‘How to vote now?’”